Why Can’t We Live Together? A Philosophical Reflection on Human Division

The present era shows people have developed extreme challenges to coexist peacefully. People dislike each other without objective evidence, which results from prejudices they receive from others above any first-hand knowledge. So many people hate while loving, and it proves especially arduous that such behavior prompts vital questions about human nature. The piece begins a philosophical expedition to trace human division using insights from ancient scholars. This analysis investigates how six ancient philosophers from Plato to Enictetus to Aristotle to Socrates to Diogenes the Cynic to Confucius, can explain contemporary social issues, including the fear people experience and insecurity they face together with societal influences and tribal identity along with ego and pride through misinformation spread by social media and deficient emotional intelligence. The subsequent analysis explores how philosophers provide understanding to handle these obstacles toward achieving better comprehension and harmony. Follow me as we reveal essential wellspring insights that light up relevant contemporary troubles and direct our way to social union and compassion.

Fear and Insecurity

The present-day world experiences fear and insecurity because people feel threatened by their differences in race, religion, lifestyle, and tribal affiliation. People effortlessly transform their anxiety into bigotry since they prefer to hold on to their initial assumptions and historical fears instead of actively studying individuals who differ from them.

Plato reveals the concept through his legendary account found in The Republic Book VII, in which Plato describes prisoners confined to a cave. Under the allegory, prisoners locked in chains see only illusions because they remain ignorant about the existence of external reality. The freed prisoner returns to relate the outside reality to jailmates, yet they disbelieve him because their restricted view has become comfortable for them. In Book VII, Plato demonstrates that our fear stems from our commitment to false, dim understandings cast on cave walls (Plato, n.d.).

Today’s society can leave the cave and face fear and insecurity through the exploration of truth and communication with people who exist beyond our prejudicial beliefs. Breaking free from ignorance demands education and honest communication to achieve understanding between people. Our path to knowledge and empathy arises when we challenge our current views while rewarding ourselves with curiosity. This transformation makes knowledge replace fear, while empathy is a substitute for prejudice.

Influence of Social Narratives

Present-Day Problem: People adopt hatred and prejudices toward others because they trust information from others even though they lack personal adverse encounters. The tendency to hold prejudiced beliefs stems from social learning through parents, peers, media, and political leaders who perpetuate biased information that people learn as if they were traditions.

Philosopher Epictetus, in his Enchiridion (Chapter 5), explains, “Things in themselves do not create disturbance but our interpretations of these things” (Epictetus, n.d., Chapter 5). According to his viewpoint, we must evaluate our beliefs before we adopt them. People end up divided because their judgments of unexamined stories exceed the actual content of those stories.

Present-day use calls for people to evaluate their handed-down beliefs through personal encounters that counter negative predispositions. Examining delivered narratives and first-hand truth-seeking leads to freedom from inherited hate patterns. Being courageous enough to examine our beliefs while showing dedication to logical thinking is necessary.

Tribalism and Group Identity

The feeling of being separated into distinct groups with strong identities produces distrust and attacks against outsiders who remain outside the defined groups. The importance of community creates a drawback because it generates the inevitable exclusion of outsiders.

In his work, Politics Book I, Aristotle explains that humans are “zoon politikon” (political/social animals) who naturally establish community bonds. According to Aristotle, the essential element for sustaining a flourishing city-state consists of brotherly love known as philia. In his discussion, he acknowledges that maintaining inner-circle solidarity should not lead us to deny respect for everyone (Nicomachean Ethics Book VIII). An environment of shared human values needs to be the fundamental basis of community instead of one that excludes people.

The current world needs to develop communities founded on justice and compassion that celebrate differences among people. Recognizing human unity enables us to construct communities that embrace diversity instead of generating fear towards it. Changing group identity demands the inclusion of all humanity under one umbrella regardless of membership status.

Ego and Pride

People fail to resolve differences because of their excessive ego and pride, leading to enduring hatred from ordinary disputes. Failure to acknowledge mistakes and a lack of empathy toward others leads directly to war and discord between people and groups.

According to Socrates, knowledge of self is the foundation for acquiring wisdom, as noted in the Apology. Through this statement about knowing nothing, he illustrated how humility allows one to search for truth properly. Socrates employed his method known as elenchus to spark discussions while showing his ignorance first for better analytic exploration (Plato, n.d., Apology).

People who wish to overcome ego and pride should develop humility through discussions with others. Our ability to understand our restricted knowledge while seeking wisdom from other people leads to better understanding and decreased interpersonal conflicts. Accepting vulnerability is necessary for setting aside our quest for being correct.

Social Media and Misinformation

Social platforms create information silos that let wrong information reproduce at warp speed while it provokes hatred and misunderstanding among users. How algorithms function creates user profiles that show them biased content and numerous viral posts contain shallow truth with little fact-based information.

The philosopher Diogenes the Cynic decided to live with authenticity by claiming to be an inhabitant of the entire world instead of having a traditional social identity. Social media would seem to him full of fake appearances and pretenses (Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book VI). Diogenes evaluated authenticity more highly than following conventional social traditions.

Modern use of social media requires evaluating the content we read while placing personal dialog above internet-based acceptance. Our pursuit of truth during a viral content investigation through trusted sources enables false information acknowledgment and authentic personal relationship construction. People need to maintain awareness of their digital platform interactions.

Lack of Emotional Intelligence and Empathy

The problems today stem from people being incapable of maturing emotionally and showing empathy since they struggle to understand emotions in themselves and others, which results in disputes. This deficiency hinders peaceful coexistence.

Confucius became a philosopher who explained humaneness as a combination of empathy and care toward others through his book Analects Book XV. The philosopher imparted his philosophy that inner peace originates from personal development before expanding toward building respect for others in society. Empathy’s core meaning lies in his well-known statement, “Do not impose on others what you do not desire” (Confucius, n.d., Book XV).

Today’s building of emotional intelligence and empathy includes active listening habits, reflective reaction planning, and seeing people by reflecting on their images. Developing these competencies with help from self-awareness practices and mindfulness leads to enhanced relationships and more constructive ways to settle disputes. Achieving this goal demands continual assessment of personal feelings and those expressed by others.

 Conclusion

Throughout this study, we uncovered crucial philosophical ideas about human separation, which continue to matter in the present time. These ancient teachings, led by Plato and others such as Epictetus, provide a comprehensive guide to address contemporary social issues with their messages about seeking true vision through transcendence and questioning interpretations, as well as their lessons on community-life balance and dialogic humility and their condemnation of pretentious behavior combined with empathetic understanding.

To understand these philosophies, we must begin with personal awareness, which we should combine with kindness. A transformation starts through three basic practices: steady listening instead of intense judging and showing interest in comprehension before aiming for complete understanding. An embodiment of these principles, starting with education and dialogue, will lead to humble authenticity and empathy, creating a loving society that defeats hate.

Plato’s dictum reminds us: “Be kind because every person you encounter battles a difficult fight” (Plato, n.d., Republic). Everyone in our path toward unity should engage in introspective and extensive outward observation with wise emotional understanding and compassionate empathy.

Reflection Questions

Have you ever passed judgment on someone through presumptions while neglecting to learn about them directly?

Have you got beliefs that you did not verify yourself?

Does striking the right balance between group loyalty and showing respect to outsiders present itself as a challenge to you?

When was the last time you acknowledged your mistakes and gained helpful knowledge?

How do you cross-check the information you distribute over social media platforms?

Can you recall a situation when you could not grasp what the other person was experiencing yet you picked a side on the argument or issue at hand?

References

  • (n.d.). Analects (J. Legge, Trans.).
  • Diogenes Laertius. (n.d.). Lives of the Eminent Philosophers (R.D. Hicks, Trans.).
  • (n.d.). Enchiridion (E. Carter, Trans.).
  • (n.d.). Apology (B. Jowett, Trans.).
  • (n.d.). The Republic (B. Jowett, Trans.).
  • (n.d.). Nicomachean Ethics (W.D. Ross, Trans.).
  • (n.d.). Politics (B. Jowett, Trans.).

 

Share your love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *